| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human Services ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
''Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human Services'' was a lawsuit filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation as a constitutional challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
==Background of the case==
The lawsuit, initiated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, argued that the ACA was still unconstitutional, even in light of the "saving construction" given the law in ''NFIB v. Sebelius'', on the ground that the enactment of the essential coverage mandate violated the Origination Clause. The suit also sought clarification from the District Court as to what extent lower courts were legally bound by the conclusion of Chief Justice Roberts and the four dissenting justices that the Act did not pass constitutional scrutiny by way of the Commerce and Necessary & Proper Clauses.〔
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human Services」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|